Alex White on charter schools and school funding

Alex White on charter schools and school funding
Green Party Candidate Alex White discusses plans to reduce violence. (

Green Party Candidate Alex White discusses plans to reduce violence. (


October 13, 2013

Last week we learned that Lovely Warren has chosen not to debate Green Party Mayoral candidate Alex White. For voters seeking meaningful discussion of the issues and an exchange of ideas, her decision was highly disappointing. Given that education is the cornerstone of her campaign (and the topic of our blog), I felt especially shortchanged.

As such, I invited White to present his position on charter schools and school funding. I welcome a response from Ms. Warren. In a previous post, I worried that Warren’s advocacy of the charter school movement would undermine the RCSD support staff’s public union, BENTE (Board of Education Non-Teaching Employees). On Lovely Warren, charter schools, and jobs

In his response, White also discusses potential impacts on the teaching profession. My comments are in italics.

WHITE: “Every year it seems the RCSD has fewer teachers, larger classes, and worse results. These conditions wear out teachers who struggle with disruptive students and inadequate assistance. Rather than getting better, the district seems every year to have to reduce staff and cut programs. While other districts would keep the programs and teachers they need, our district is forced to keep only those it can afford.

The center piece of Lovely Warren’s plan to solve this problem is creating a new system of schools called charters. These schools will siphon money away from the public schools, and attract many of the better students. Yet, in national studies charter schools get similar results as public schools. While 29% of charter schools do better. 31% do worse. Furthermore, they also pay their teachers less.

Of course one of the ways to improve schools is better teachers. As charters pay roughly 25% less, it is unlikely these will attract better teachers and frequently have trouble keeping any they do get. Further, funneling money out of the public schools will make it harder to educate the students in that system.

One of the key drawbacks of charter school is they are non-union (and in some cases profit-driven), inevitably leading to lessened compensation and working conditions. Invariably, better working conditions translate into better learning outcomes for students. Rochester, Monroe County and New York State have benefited from a robust and effective public union, one that is a strong advocate against crippling budget cuts. For all the RTA-bashing, consider the striking success of many (unionized, of course) suburban schools.

Now while education is very important to the success of the city, this is the role of the school board. The mayor can do little about this unless there is mayoral control. Even with mayoral control, such changes would provide great disruption in the lives of our students and waste precious resources on reorganization. The real solution is to stop playing politics with education and just provide the funding needed. For years the city payments to the district has remained fixed despite rising costs. Further, the city is constantly finding ways to charge the district for services which should be free. So with less money why would be expect our schools to improve?

My plan is to fund the education we need. Presently we are required to provide so much money for education. Nothing says we could not provide more. I would encourage the district to present programs which are good, and then the city will provide additional funds for these. This way we could have programs like a full day preschool option for 4 year olds, day care in schools, teen court, arts and music for all students, and much more. These programs will keep more children in school and help more succeed.

These issues are exacerbated when we consider Rochester has the seventh highest childhood poverty rate in the nation. “Wraparound services”—prenatal counseling for expectant mothers, programs for preschoolers, longer schools days, after-school and summer activities, and other support services–are urgently need in low-income neighborhoods.

Providing additional money can be done without raising taxes on everyone by ending the tax breaks we have given to some of our wealthiest landlords. Meanwhile, my opponent continues to vote for more and more of these. It is time to really ask ourselves, why do we need subsidize landlords? For example, Voters Block apartments built for 20.3 million but paid only $1161.17 in taxes, or education for our children. To me this is simple, and my plan is to get the schools what they need.”

If education is your priority, consider closely White’s analysis and proposals. And, at the same time, reflect on Warren’s reticence to engage her opposition in public forums.

see also Green Party candidate Alex White offers plans to reduce violence

Tagged , , , ,

About The Author

Welcome to Talker of the Town! My name is David Kramer. I have a Ph.D in English and teach at Keuka College. I am a former and still active Fellow at the Nazareth College Center for Public History and a Storyteller in Residence at the SmallMatters Institute. Over the years, I have taught at Monroe Community College, the Rochester Institute of Technology and St. John Fisher College. I have published numerous Guest Essays, Letters, Book Reviews and Opinion pieces in The New York Times, Rochester Democrat and Chronicle, the Buffalo News, the Rochester Patriot, the Providence Journal, the Providence Business News, the Brown Alumni Magazine, the New London Day, the Boston Herald, the Messenger Post Newspapers, the Wedge, the Empty Closet, the CITY, Lake Affect Magazine and Brighton Connections. My poetry appears in The Criterion: An International Journal in English and Rundenalia and my academic writing in War, Literature and the Arts and Twentieth Century Literary Criticism. Starting in February 2013, I wrote for three Democratic and Chronicle  blogs, "Make City Schools Better," "Unite Rochester," and the "Editorial Board." When my tenure at the D & C  ended, I wanted to continue conversations first begun there. And start new ones.  So we created this new space, Talker of the Town, where all are invited to join. I don’t like to say these posts are “mine.” Very few of them are the sole product of my sometimes overheated imagination. Instead, I call them partnerships and collaborations. Or as they say in education, “peer group work.” Talker of the Town might better be Talkers of the Town. The blog won’t thrive without your leads, text, pictures, ideas, facebook shares, tweets, comments and criticisms.


Like what you see on our site? We’d appreciate your support. Please donate today.

Featured Posts


%d bloggers like this: