“Yoga Play” at Geva: Even more neo-Marxist fun

“Yoga Play” at Geva: Even more neo-Marxist fun

[David Kramer holding the playbill and attempting the yoga lotus position. Photo: Ed Wiltse.  SEE THE GEVA SERIES AT END]

Last week, I was accompanied at Geva’s production of Yoga Play with neighbor Ed Wiltse, professor of literature and film at Nazareth College whose critical insights inform my reading of the play. Ed is also well versed in Frederic Jameson’s neo-Marxist The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act (1981) that also informs my reading of Yoga Play.¹

Ed Wiltsie in front of display holding various yoga accoutrements [Photo: David Kramer]

At the risk of boring the reader, I first used a Jamesonian analysis in Parasite at The Little: What would Frederic Jameson see? about the award winning film.

In simplified terms, Jameson asserts the priority of ideological analysis or political interpretation (“The Political Unconscious”) of cultural narratives (“Socially Symbolic Acts”). Literature – and film – functions by creating imaginary solutions to real social problems.

David Kramer with Frederic Jameson’s The Political Unconscious  Parasite at The Little: What would Frederic Jameson see?

The problems to be solved are the social contradictions between the owners of capital and those exploited by capital. The imaginary solutions work by raising a social anxiety – a potential disrupting element — then relieving, suppressing, dispelling or containing the disruption.

In Slow Food at Geva: More neo-Marxist fun , I attempted another neo-Marxist interpretation.

Fundamentally, as explained in Parasite, Jameson posits that many literary texts — especially ones in the dominant discourse — work by first revealing real ideological or social anxieties or tensions. Ultimately, the anxieties or tensions are suppressed or accommodated. In vulgar — but apt — Marxist terms, the couple (Irene and Peter) are socially symbolic figures of “the bourgeoisie,” while the waiter (Stephen) — who earns his livelihood serving the bourgeois — represents “the proletariat.” Perhaps tellingly, the playbill does not note Stephen’s first name, only referring to him as “The Waiter.”

The neo-Marxist critic at Geva from Slow Food at Geva: More neo-Marxist fun.

Within the fictive universe of the play, Stephen — intruding upon the couple — becomes the site of potentially destabilizing, subverting or threatening anxiety as he disturbs their expectations of a vacation meal at an upscale Greek restaurant in Palm Springs. Roles are reversed as Stephen lords it over the couple who are at his mercy while anticipating food that does not come.

Finally, order is restored. Peter decides to loan Stephen money for a restaurant, making Stephen an honorary bourgeoise, although several rungs beneath Peter, now his benefactor.

Yoga Play is a comedy but also addresses serious issues, such as child labor, @Metoo, homophobia, the glass ceiling for women executives, fat shaming, racism against Asians and Indian-Americans, the soullessness of capitalism, the greed of the managerial class, and how spirituality becomes a profitable commodity. As Geva’s Executive Leaders Mark Cuddy and Chris Manelli say, comedies like Yoga Play are rare, writing that “the 1930s and 1940s birthed fast-talking comedies, but contemporary stage comedies are narrow in their comedic arc, leaving any commentary to stand-up comedians.”


While I admire the ambition of writer Diprik Guha, I agreed with Ed that, while the acting was very deft — as is always the case at Geva — the play tackled too many themes, leading to an outcome that Ed saw as “incoherent” in its multiplicity.

The cast from the playbill

Stock broker and former local actor Bob Katz, concurred with Ed that the play lacked focus, saying the script felt all over the place.

The play has finished its run so I can gave a full account.

In the opening scene, a New Agey John (played by Christopher Gurr) is holding a zoom meeting with his top executives. While written before the covid pandemic, the scene reminds us of the days of home quarantine.

John runs the profitable Jojomom Inc. that sells yoga merchandise. In John’s mind, he is also selling capitalism with a spiritual face; John’s mantra is authenticity. He demands his team call customers and staff “family.” Products are not marketed but “authenticated.” Employees (I mean family) are encouraged to practice yoga, doing so begrudgingly. Employees (I mean family) are given time each day to tell about their dreams the night before. Ed described John as “entertainingly awful.”

Geva’s subscriber pack. We didn’t need to coat check coupon as it was a warm day.

After the meeting, John drops off the grid for 4 weeks, perhaps meditating in nature. His absence coincides with an episode ripe for Jamesonian analysis. The firm (I mean famly) has opened a factory in Bangladesh and becomes enmeshed in a highly publicized child labor scandal. Its stock price plummets and its customers (I mean family) are outraged. The company (I mean family) that prides itself on authenticity is now called “fake.”

Jameson might see the crisis as the central anxiety raised by the play; the anxiety that capitalism might not be a force for good or enlightenment.

However, following the Jamesonian script, order is restored; capitalism is saved. One executive goes on tv pretending to be a yoga guru defending the company (I mean family). Suddenly, the executive “goes rogue” when he tells viewers that to be happy, they should not buy things. In a Jamesonian imaginary solution, the counterintuitive approach works: stock prices soar and the company is better than ever. As Ed says, the executives win.

Afterwards, the characters seem to find some “real” authenticity. One seeks love; another becomes more open about his gayness; another seeks friendship with her secretary. Ed is dubious that we are to see the characters having genuine epiphanies.

Most significantly, the three executives get raises. Jameson might say their seeming discovery of authenticity glosses over that the play drops the theme of the abuses of child labor. The children of Bangladesh, forced to work at age 12, are forgotten. They get lost in the comedy and social satire about faux authenticity. At closure, we see no systemic means by which capitalism can rectify its wrongs.  It is business as usual in the political unconscious of Yoga Play.


¹Ed has a humorous Jamesonian story. When Ed was in grad school, he gave a talk at a Marxist conference.  To Ed’s surprise, if not dismay, the great man of letters came to Ed’s session. Jameson lived up to his reputation for asking good questions and offering a generosity of time for younger scholars.

My experience is pure chagrin. When I was a graduate student at the University of Rhode Island, Jameson gave a lecture on contemporary film. He kindly signed my copy of  The Political Unconscious. We discussed his theories. Actually, Jameson said that over time, his conceptual framework grows left effective. He joked that we need neo-neo Marxism. When I went to retrieve my copy for Parasite, it was lost. Unconscionable. I had to borrow a copy from the University of Rochester.

The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act by Frederic Jameson (1981, 1983 edition) Note: whoever borrowed the book committed the readerly sin of writing notes in the margin — albeit in pencil — that he or she did not erase. [Held at and scanned courtesy of the Rush Rhees Library at the University of Rochester] From Parasite at The Little: What would Frederic Jameson see?



Real men and air guitar at Geva. Plus, win a $46.75 ticket


“Slow Food” at Geva: More neo-Marxist fun.

Geva’s “Once” and eastern European fatalism


Talker has two tickets to Geva. Seeking connoisseur of the arts

Geva’s Hard Cell and problematic caricatures

Performing gender at Geva: La Cage aux Folles

Geva’s “The Niceties” and the 1619 Project


Thumbs up for Geva’s “Thurgood”


Deconstructing (and admiring) GeVa’s “Miracle on South Division Street” through the looking glass.

A finely executed performance of Mockingbird at GEVA. And on the “white trash” Ewells

What critics said about Moon for the Misbegotten from 1947 onward

The office as therapy in Geva’s The May Queen


Seeing Red. Did we violate “sacred space” backstage at GeVa?

About The Author


Welcome to Talker of the Town! My name is David Kramer. I have a Ph.D in English and teach at Keuka College. I am a former and still active Fellow at the Nazareth College Center for Public History and a Storyteller in Residence at the SmallMatters Institute. Over the years, I have taught at Monroe Community College, the Rochester Institute of Technology and St. John Fisher College. I have published numerous Guest Essays, Letters, Book Reviews and Opinion pieces in The New York Times, Rochester Democrat and Chronicle, the Buffalo News, the Rochester Patriot, the Providence Journal, the Providence Business News, the Brown Alumni Magazine, the New London Day, the Boston Herald, the Messenger Post Newspapers, the Wedge, the Empty Closet, the CITY, Lake Affect Magazine and Brighton Connections. My poetry appears in The Criterion: An International Journal in English and Rundenalia and my academic writing in War, Literature and the Arts and Twentieth Century Literary Criticism. Starting in February 2013, I wrote for three Democratic and Chronicle  blogs, "Make City Schools Better," "Unite Rochester," and the "Editorial Board." When my tenure at the D & C  ended, I wanted to continue conversations first begun there. And start new ones.  So we created this new space, Talker of the Town, where all are invited to join. I don’t like to say these posts are “mine.” Very few of them are the sole product of my sometimes overheated imagination. Instead, I call them partnerships and collaborations. Or as they say in education, “peer group work.” Talker of the Town might better be Talkers of the Town. The blog won’t thrive without your leads, text, pictures, ideas, facebook shares, tweets, comments and criticisms.


Like what you see on our site? We’d appreciate your support. Please donate today.

Featured Posts